Sunday, December 30, 2007

Glückliches Neues Jahr!

Alan and Scout at dinner.

So many of our traditional Christmas observances come from Germany, or northern Europe in general -- the Christmas tree, mistletoe, St. Nicholas (Santa Claus) (not the original saint, but the Christmas trappings), wassail bowl ("glühwein"), and many of the Christmas carols.

Several of our family members were able to experience a German Christmas this year -- German, but tempered with familiar American customs. I arrived home from Stuttgart last night, where we'd been the guests of Suzanne and Alan for ten days.
Alan serves with the USMC, often away on worldwide missions, but based in Germany.

Their hospitality was overwhelming!

My own favorite memories:

  • Our picturesque hotel for three nights in the little Black Forest village of Obereichenbach.
  • "Shopping" for cuckoo clocks in Triberg, and hiking up to the frozen waterfall.
  • Walking with Scout and family on hikes through the frozen fields and woods near Suzanne and Alan's house.
  • Go-Kart racing! After half an hour, my eyes were glazed and my fingers had to be pried loose from the steering wheel.
  • Visiting the military hospital at the U.S. base at Landstuhl.
  • Our whirlwind overnight visit to Strasbourg in near-by France.
  • One wonderful meal after another, from a three-star restaurant in the heart of the Black Forest, to a meter-long bratwurst bought from a little booth at the Christmas fair in Stuttgart. Having Scout be permitted to join us at restuarant meals.
  • Barton's retirement dinner, where the chief waiter presented him with the world's most appropriate retirement present. The waiter's witty speech almost outshone the gift itself.
  • Our last-day visit to the Mercedes-Benz museum, in the auto maker's home town. The museum displayed a fascinating history of the development of automotive science and design, told in the context of the social and political history of the 20th century, especially in Germany.

A great visit. Thanks so much to Alan and Suzanne. Thanks also to all the other members of the family, whose presence made this a most memorable Christmas.

----------------------------
NOTE FROM AUTHOR: November and December have been odd months, with family trips and family holidays diverting my attention. The few posts published in those months have tended to be of interest only to family members themselves. With the beginning of 2008, the Northwest Corner will return to its regular programming -- topics that I hope will be of interest to all readers.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Season's Greetings!


Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!


The Northwest Corner once more shuts down while its writer, yours truly, joins family in Stuttgart, Germany, to celebrate Christmas. My best holiday wishes to all my family, friends, regular readers, potential readers, former readers. To all of America, to all of humanity. To (as our very wise Buddhist friends would say) all sentient beings.


I'll be back home on December 29, and will rejoin you here in the blogosphere for a very interesting and rewarding 2008. Have a great holiday season!

Friday, December 14, 2007

Lyra's World at the Movies


No movie can fully capture the depth and complexity and magic of a good book. The Lord of the Rings trilogy perhaps came closest, but, good as the film versions were, they emphasized endless battle scenes at the expense of some of the more subtle messages of Tolkien's books. To me, a fundamental theme of the written LOTR trilogy was the theme of loss, the sense that when one fights a war, even the winner loses much that he had fought to save. Return of the King tried to convey this sense of loss in its final, much-ridiculed half hour, at the Grey Havens, but by that time it was perhaps too late.

Back in May, I wrote with anticipation of the long-awaited filming of the first book of Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy, The Golden Compass (published originally in Britain as Northern Lights). I concluded my post with the words: "Assuming the film bears any resemblance at all to the book, I say "two thumbs up" even before I see it! Don't miss it!"

The movie was released a week ago. The reviews have been mixed, and the first week's gross receipts, perhaps as a result, disappointing. Many have felt that the movie was less subtle, less complex, less intellectually satisfying, than the book. Well, duh! That's always the case. The movie presents in two hours a book that takes much longer to read, and that has room for far more complexity and development. Philosophical and theological ideas that develop slowly in the reader's awareness, absorbed from the plot itself, in a two hour movie must be presented either in narrative voice overs (parallel universes exist, a pompous voice exclaims at the outset, where humans have souls that look like animals!), or in unlikely lectures by characters, inserted in the midst of the plot. (If you hate such plot-slowing lectures, never read The DaVinci Code, where the author was unable to tell his story without such artifices even in a lengthy written novel.)

In the time available, I feel that the movie actually did a more than adequate job of presenting all the major events, characters, and plot developments of the book. This is a movie, like The Fellowship of the Ring, that will make far more sense and be more appealing to persons already familiar with the books. The movie moves quickly. The viewer has little time to mull over plot and character development before the next crisis, the next character, the next twist of plot, arrives on the scene. You can't turn back five pages to recall who had which daemon. But the film does a more than adequate job of laying the foundation -- and creating an appetite -- for the next of the series, The Subtle Knife.

Visually, the movie could hardly be better. In LOTR, we marveled at the integration of the computerized Gollum into the filming of the live characters. In The Golden Compass, an enormous number of animal daemons, witches, armored bears, and mechanical insects fight, talk, and maneuver along side the live action cast. It's all done so seamlessly that we hardly appreciate the technical skills involved.

And the daemons! As we gradually learn in the book, and as the voice-over informs us bluntly at the beginning of the movie, every human in Lyra's world has his or her appropriate daemon, an animal companion representing an embodiment of the human's soul. In the many mob scenes, all the humans have to be shown with their daemons -- whether these are large impressive animals for complex characters -- snow leopards, golden monkeys, wolves -- or small simple daemons for simple folks -- birds, small dogs. The filming is handled beautifully, and we quickly grow accustomed to Lord Asriel stalking into the room, his leopard at his side, or, more movingly, Lyra's loving daemon, still capable of changing into a bird or a cat when appropriate, but usually presented as an ermine with an expressive face. (The Texas pilot's daemon, a female rabbit with a sarcastic Texan drawl, is hysterically funny.)

Death in such a world is dramatic. In the book, when a human was killed his daemon quickly faded away. In the movie, his daemon explodes in a flash of light. Battle scenes are thus spectacular!

Finally, a serious concern even before the movie was made was how the director, Chris Weitz, would handle the religious question. In the book, Lyra's world was ruled by a version of the Catholic Church that had, in her world, adopted some aspects of Calvinism during the Reformation and had moved its headquarters to Geneva. The Church, in the book, is a malevolent force. Its leaders' objective is to maintain control over the people, and to protect them from "sin," which in the author's vision is the same as protecting them from true adulthood. In the first book's most devastating scene, only somewhat less affecting in the movie, the Church conducts experiments in an Arctic laboratory, experiments it hopes will find a way to eliminate sin by surgically cutting the bond between children and their daemons before the kids reach puberty. The vision of the little boy -- now effectively soulless -- crying all alone in the frozen North for his lost daemon is unforgettable.

New Line Cinema could not see any advantage to releasing a movie for young people that attacks -- even in an alien world -- an institution that resembles in any way Christianity in our world.

We knew that Pullman's professed atheism would have to be tamed to some degree in the movie. How much, no one was sure. This month's issue of the Atlantic Monthly contains a lengthy (and very interesting) article by Hanna Rosin arguing that the movie gutted the book, leaving behind a couple of hours of simple entertainment for the mass audience. "The studio opted to kidnap the book's body and leave behind its soul."

I disagree. First of all, the trilogy's "soul" was not a logical attack on religion. It was a fantasy with many themes. It described a malevolent, or at least sadly mistaken, Church. But it also described the Chuch's God as a pathetic, senile old man floating around in space, who in his elder days was dominated by his supposed subordinates. It presented angels -- good, bad, and a couple who were gay. It presented flying witches. It presented talking, armored bears of incredible strength and endurance. It presented pathways between universes.

No one, no child, would take any of this as anything but a ripping good yarn. A fairy tale, a story of "what if?" Insofar as it contained a message, it was a call for every person to grow up, take responsibility, seek out the unknown, be brave, sacrifice the self for the common welfare, and love others. Hardly subversive. Those who see it as an attack on religion should ask themselves why they see a greater relationship between the "Church" in Lyra's world and any religion in our own world than they do between any other of the story's fictional devices and anything we're familiar with. Both those who applaud and those who fear the movie -- as an attack on religion -- should ask themselves that question.

In any event, to answer the Atlantic's critique, I don't see that the movie seriously watered down the philosophical questions of the books, except insofar as necessary to make a short movie and to avoid unnecessary offense to Christians . The movie always refers to the Church as "the Magisterium," and in the only reference to the fictional God of that world calls him "the Authority." Anyone old enough to be interested in the movie, beyond the level of cheering for awesome fights between armored bears, will recognize the religious references. Anyone that old, I would hope, also recognizes a fantasy when he or she sees one.

So my pre-release verdict from last spring holds. "Two thumbs up. Go see it!"

(But you really should read the books first!)

-------------
(12-16-07) -- The movie has drawn an extraordinary amount of comment on the internet, much of it from Christian writers. The majority of Christian commentators appear to feel that the movie, and even more the books, present a threat to children's faith. Others, however, view the movie as a well-produced fantasy, one that is not only entertaining but that presents parents with an opening for serious discussions of religious faith and theology with their children.

The Pullman trilogy is an "ode to the joy of living in a physical world, a hymn to flesh, to exuberance, to the here and now, to free thought, imagination and feeling, to nobility of spirit," according to a review by Washington Post book critic Michael Dirda.

"I happen to think that these positive traits are entirely compatible with organized religion and so I choose to focus on the positive rather than on any anti-religious themes in these books," said Paul Lauritzen, director of the Program in Applied Ethics at Jesuit-run John Carroll University in Cleveland, commenting on Dirda's review. Lauritzen is a contributor to dotCommonweal, a blog run by the Catholic magazine Commonweal.
--© 2007 Catholic News Service/USCCB

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Office for Film and Broadcasting gave the film, which is rated PG-13, a warm review. The film is not blatantly anti-Catholic but a “generalized rejection of authoritarianism,” it said.

While noting the story’s “spirit of rebellion and stark individualism,” the office said Lyra and her allies’ stand for free will in opposition to the coercive force of the Magisterium is “entirely in harmony with Catholic teaching.”
--MSNBC (11-30-07)



Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Laos & Cambodia, 2007

Here are some random photos,

giving a sampling of the sights we saw


Sunset over the Mekong River. Luang Prabang, Laos.










Young Buddhist monk















Hiking a dusty road in Laos
(accompanied by chickens)
















Angkor Wat, Cambodia














Kayaking in the Nam Song River

Near Vang Vieng, Laos












Buddhist monks.
















Highland Lao village boys,
playing soccer

Northern Laos











Denny demonstrating favorite pasttime

Drinking beer.

Vang Vieng, Laos






Killing fields of the Khmer Rouge
1975-79

Skulls displayed in memorial stupa

Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Monday, December 3, 2007

And the Sun comes up like Thunder


Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the twain shall meet. --Kipling

Kipling may have been a bit of a racist, but he hit the bull's eye when it comes to time zones. After two weeks of living on Southeast Asia time, I now find myself suddenly standing on my head: Noon is midnight, and midnight is noon. My stomach is thinking about lunch when the night is darkest.

Tomorrow I go to work. I suspect I'll be dreaming of a soft bed about the time lunch is served.

Today's confused traveler navigates between East and West by existing -- you can't call it living -- for about 24 hours in a comatose gray zone, a twilight zone of the soul, a state we can call Airline World. In Airline World -- which encompasses airports as well as the airplanes themselves -- it's never a.m. or p.m., light or dark -- it's always "fluorescent light time." It's neither sleep time nor meal time. No one ever really sleeps, and meals are always available and are always being served.

In Airline World, one dwells in neither East nor West, but in a global culture of blandness and boredom. An airport in Bangkok is different from an airport in San Francisco only in its superficial (and institutional) decorative touches. A flight on Vietnam Airlines differs from a flight on Alaska Airlines only because you're forced to hear one or more additional translations of the same old AirlineSpeak flight instructions whose English versions you've long ago memorized. "Welcome to Siem Reap. Please check about your seat and in the overhead compartments for any personal belongings you may have overlooked. We will be deplaning through the left forward exit. Thank you again for flying with us today. We hope to see you again soon. Have a nice day in Siem Reap or wherever your travel plans may take you."

But your existence for 24 hours or so in Airline World is a necessary evil if you're ever to make the transition between East and West, the twain of which -- as Kipling has reminded us -- never meet. While your brain is stepped down into a low energy state, sensing only gray vision and white noise, it is being reprogramed to confront the world outside your airport of arrival. Not just to confront the disorienting change of time zones, vital to you as that will be, but to adapt your life to the changes in customs and world views as well. I suspect that Airline World allows some earlier-installed software to run inside you, resulting in the conversion:

IF new time zone is GMT minus 5 -8, THEN DELETE "smiling at strangers."
DELETE "living in the present."
DELETE "sensing and expressing esthetic pleasure in small beauties of life."
DELETE "attempting to appreciate cultural differences."
RESTORE "USA Daily Life Craziness software package"

So here I am, 12 hours after arrival in Seattle, and 12 hours until my first post-vacation work day begins. My computer brain has completed all the above deletions, leaving me in a state of passive grayness that obviously prevents me from writing a coherent blog posting. But still unrestored and uninstalled is the Daily Life Craziness package, the set of conditioned reflexes that creates my illusion of meaningfulness and self-importance, that enables me to live life from day to day with what is laughingly called an integrated personality.

Finally, ignore all the above jet-lag-induced ravings. Denny and I had a great trip. Southeast Asia is a beautiful part of the world, populated by beautiful and graceful people. I have much still to ponder about my brief two weeks of travel in the area. Some of my ultimate observations will probably trickle forth into these pages from time to time. Meanwhile:

"Had a wonderful time. Wish you'd been there. Nice to be back."

Photo: Tonle Sap lake, near Siem Reap, Cambodia. Taken 12/2/07.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Closed for Renovation



Be Back


In


December










The World Famous Northwest Corner will be closed for a little sprucing up over the next couple or three weeks. A few repairs, a little remodeling, a touch of paint here and there. A new, more contemporary look. Strengthening of structural elements. Better plumbing and more electric. A more rational layout

No, no, no. I'm not talking about the Corner being spruced up! I'm talking about me! The Corner will merely be closed while I'm renovating myself. I'll be off in the wilds of Southeast Asia (see earlier posts), rebuilding mind, soul and body. I'll come back as a new, sleeker, wittier, more sarcastic (but I mean that in the best possible way) model; a less tired, jaded, cliché-ridden and jejune Rainier96.

And, of course, with a newly acquired taste for rice. You're gonna love the changes.

While I'm gone:

1. Have a wonderful Thanksgiving.

2. Look forward eagerly to the opening of the movie version of Philip Pullman's The Golden Compass, due for release the first week of December. (See earlier post.)

3. Check your sports pages to see whether it is Washington or Stanford that finally ends up at the very bottom of the PAC-10 standings.

4. Hope that the Administration doesn't reach for one last-ditch grasp at success and historical relevancy by invading Iran.

5. Keep track of how many more Republicans decide not to run for re-election in 2008, so they can spend more time with their families. Or their dogs. Or to take up origami as they've always dreamed of doing.

6. Await with anticipation Zachary's announcement of which colleges he's applying to this fall.

7. And ... wait eagerly for the re-opening for business of The Northwest Corner by its renovated proprietor.

Thursday, November 8, 2007

Take the "A" Train ... Please


San Francisco has BART, a sleekly beautiful interurban system. Washington, D.C., has Metro. Chicago has the antique but serviceable "El" with all its municipal and interurban connections. New York has its gritty but efficient subway system. Atlanta has MARTA. Los Angeles has its Red and Purple lines.

These are all heavy rail systems, running off of electrified third rails. Seattle voted down an excellent, comprehensive area-wide system proposed in 1969. Seattle today has no heavy rail.

Portland has MAX, carrying passengers through downtown and to outlying areas. Colorful Los Angeles has its Gold, Blue and Green lines. Vancouver has its successful SkyTrain.

These are light rail systems, more like streetcars but running on dedicated off-road routes, for the most part, and powered by overhead lines. Seattle is building a light rail line from downtown to the airport, due to open in 2009, and is planning an extension northwards to the University, which may open in 2016. That's all we have in the way of light rail.

I'm depressed.

The light rail authorized to date will be nice for users of the airport, and the extension will be convenient for students. But it does not come close to a comprehensive rail transit system. And Tuesday, voters rejected a ballot measure that would have provided funding for an additional 50 miles of light rail, extending the system into Pierce County to the south and Snohomish County to the north. The measure lost by a decisive margin.

This city has enormous difficulty in carrying through on any project. Part of our problem seems to be the local press. Whenever a public project is suggested, the newspapers are full of excited stories and beautiful architectural drawings. Everyone professes excitement. The project goes forward. Then comes the election to provide financing. All of a sudden, new forces within the newspapers' management seem to surge to the surface. Stories of cost overruns and faulty estimates abound. Headlines warn voters of the increases to come in their tax bills if the measure is approved. Questions are raised -- does this project, paid for us all, only serve certain elite groups (or only poor folks, depending on the project), although paid for by everyone?

An editorial written by a senior editor in one of the two dailies, shortly before the election, was filled with dark forebodings of the money to be wasted, the boondoggle being thrust upon us. He ended with his coup de grâce-- ask yourselves, he wrote, how much good am I -- yes, me, myself, as an individual -- going to get out of this transit system? Ah yes, the attitude that made this country great: "What's in it for me?"

What's in it for me, of course, besides the fact that I think rail transit is inherently cool, is an electrically powered system of mass transit, separated for most of its route from motor vehicle traffic, and able to move people about the city, and to and from work, with a minimum amount of CO2 emissions, a minimum amount of energy consumption, and a maximum amount of speed.

Which brings us to the Sierra Club. I'm a long-time member and fervent supporter of the Sierra Club. The Club has done wonderful work in setting aside wilderness areas and parks, work for which future generations will owe them immense gratitude. But the local chapter of the Sierra Club may well have tipped the balance in ensuring defeat of the rapid transit measure. The problem, for the Club's decision makers, was that the proposition also authorized a large amount of road and bridge construction. They opposed making it easier to drive cars.

I'm not an automobile enthusiast. I love visiting New York and European cities, places where you can spend days traveling around by transit, without needing a car and where a car is merely an encumbrance. But Seattle is not that kind of city yet. It wouldn't have been, even with 50 more miles of rail transit, and even with an excellent Metro bus system. A large percentage of the population will need to depend on motor vehicle transportation for the foreseeable future. As the density of transit routes and the frequency of service increase, that percentage will decrease. But for now, traffic is a nightmare. Road improvements are necessary. The objective is to improve roads and bridges with as little impact on the surrounding community as possible.

To the Sierra Club, half measures were unacceptable. They were unwilling to accept increased road construction in order to get the improved rail transit that will make even greater road construction in the future less necessary. I think that was a mistake.

So I'm depressed. I'm depressed that Seattle has talked about rail transit for so many decades, and has so little to show for it. I'm depressed at the part that the media have played in the debacle of this election. I'm depressed at the role played by the Sierra Club, an organization with whom I feel close ties.

And I'm generally depressed at our inability as a community to make decisions and work together to accomplish what we set out to do.

Monday, November 5, 2007

A Saturday Idyll




Sunset and evening star,
And one clear call for me!
And may there be no moaning of the bar,
When I put out to sea.


--Tennyson

A bright sun. A warm day. A dark blue sky. A peaceful Bay. White sails, rocky cliffs, graceful bridges, playful seals. A happy, laughing crew. And always, in the background, the skyline of San Francisco.

I flew down Friday night, and Chris -- an old hiking buddy and our skipper for the day -- met me at the airport and drove me to his home on Russian Hill. The next morning, three of Chris's friends dropped by and joined us. We drove to the marina in Berkeley, where family members from Sonoma were waiting. The eight of us -- three of us competent sailors, of whom I was not one -- set sail -- well, started the engine, actually -- on an excellent and attractive 36-foot sailboat and successfully navigated out of the marina and into San Francisco Bay for a day of sailing.

Well, for the most part, cruising.

Actually, you see, for much of the day, we were as becalmed at sea as an Ancient Mariner with an Albatross hung round his neck. But, hey, it was all good.

We sailed -- powered -- past Alcatraz with all its dark associations, around to the north side of Angel Island, where we disembarked and tested our land legs. The island -- where Chinese immigrants passed through American immigration back in the 19th century, on their way to backbreaking work on railroad crews -- is now a state park. We stopped for a snack at the small concession stand, and then hiked some distance up the trail, walking past one spectacular view after another, views of the Bay and its environs. Kathy was far in front and seemed bound for the summit, persuaded that it would take no time at all to successfully assault the 488-foot "peak." But cooler heads -- prompted by disgruntled cell phone calls from the more nautical members of our crew, waiting impatiently back at the pier -- prevailed. We skipped our way back down the trail to our awaiting boat.

To the west loomed the Golden Gate. We argonauts sailed -- powered -- our way to the ocean, passing under the ever-graceful bridge itself. We kept a nervous eye skyward, watching nervously for descending suicidal bodies. But the day obviously was too nice -- too nice even for a Californian who had lost his Prozac -- for anyone to feel sufficiently depressed for such an act of finality.

We looked astern (as we say in sailing biz), and enjoyed specacular views of the City, its hills and skyscrapers, framed between the bright orange twin towers of the bridge. The ocean was truly "pacific," its surface as calm as that of the Bay itself. But then, just as nervous images flashed through our minds, images of rogue currents bearing us off Japanwards, we prudently executed a broad U-turn and headed back into the safety of the Bay

We skirted the marina and Fisherman's Wharf areas of the City, watching tourists and dogs at play in city parks, and then cut the power a final time, hoisted the mainsail and unfurled the jib (I show off my nautical jargon before I once more forget it), caught a light north wind in our sails, and skimmed peacefully eastwards, back towards Berkeley.

A get-together for drinks at Chez Chris on Russian Hill, and a seafood (of course!) dinner near Fisherman's Wharf brought us to a tired and happy conclusion of a memorable Saturday in the Bay Area.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Loki


He who must be obeyed


Saturday, October 27, 2007

The count down continues . . .


Chiang Mai, Thailand. I smile dreamily at the blank computer screen. Even the sound of its name is musical -- "Chiang Mai" -- conjuring up visions of saffron-clad monks and monasteries, peasant markets, riverside beer gardens, hidden opium dens and Eastern bandits. Just three weeks from today, Denny and I descend into Chiang Mai, flying in by quick hop from Bangkok. At the hotel, we'll meet and become acquainted with a local guide and twelve other excited travelers, our friends for the following two weeks as we wander bug-eyed through the ancient kingdoms of Laos and Cambodia. (Actually, Laos is now a "People's Democratic Republic," but never mind.)

I've visited Chiang Mai once before, five years ago. It's a beautiful and fascinating city. Chiang Mai's exotic enough, certainly, in its own right. I'm excited to sense how we're now treating it as the last outpost of 21st century civilization, a mere gathering place of convenience, before we boat across the Mekong River into Laos, pressing thence into the unknown.

I exaggerate, of course. Virtually no place in the world, sadly, is today untouristed. Apparently, even the camel caravans and souks of forbidden Timbuktu today witness trans-Sahara auto races. Thousands of Westerners visit Laos, and especially Cambodia, every year. The ruins at Angkor Wat, where we spend our final days of the trip, are a major magnet for tourists visiting Southeast Asia. Nevertheless, we will thankfully be away from those destinations -- the cruise ship ports, the casinos, the beach resorts -- that attract the great bulk of the world's tourist dollar. I deem us, therefore, to be "adventurers."

We'll travel by boat, occasionally by bicycle, on foot along forest trails and over towering ruins, by van on back roads. We'll stay in huts with ethnic tribal families and in river-bank eco-lodges, as well as in small hotels. Admittedly, I dream of weirder and more adventurous travel. I fantasize over Lonely Planet guides. I read nineteenth century explorers' journals. If Denny and I had the time, we'd visit these countries by ourselves, without guides. We'd hitch rides or buy motor bikes, sleep in hostels and tents. But we have two weeks. Life is full of compromises. I'm satisfied that we'll find this compromise to be worth every moment.

Meanwhile, my assignments at work seem to increase exponentially as the date for departure draws closer. The ever-malicious Cosmos seems determined to break my spirit, to exhaust me before I can escape Seattle. Hah! I am indomitable! I may find myself crushed beneath a stack of the accumulated detritus of two weeks of legal practice upon my return, but I am so out of here on the morning of November 16.

My loyal readers can expect a report on my return. Hopefully, you'll be spared a slide show. Meanwhile, however, I hope to find time to fire off a few more postings on subjects of more general interest before I leave.

Photo: Buddhist monk at Angkor Wat, Cambodia

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Never Apologize, Never Explain


Maher Arar, 36, is a Canadian software engineer. He immigrated with his family from Syria to Canada in 1988, when he was 17. He earned his Bachelor's degree (computer engineering) from McGill University, perhaps the most prestigious university in Canada, and his Master's degree (telecommunications) from a branch of the University of Québec. While at McGill, he met his future wife, who went on to obtain her Ph.D. in finance from McGill. They have two young children. Mr. Arar ran his own consulting firm for some time, and then was employed as a telecommunications engineer by a firm in Ottawa.

In 2002, he and his family vacationed in Tunisia. On the way home to Ottawa, he flew through JFK in New York. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police mistakenly identified Mr. Arar as no longer a Canadian, although he was traveling on a Canadian passport. Also, the RCMP had been conducting a terrorist investigation in Ottawa, and had earlier observed a conversation between Arar and another engineer who happened to be a "person of interest" in the investigation. This engineer -- the one with whom he was seen speaking -- was not himself a suspect, nor, of course, was Mr. Arar.

Nevertheless, based on this information from the RCMP, the United States seized Mr. Arar as he was changing flights at JFK, interrogated him for two weeks in this country, refused him access to an attorney, and then flew him in a small jet to Syria. He was beaten upon arrival in Damascus.

He was imprisoned in a 6' x 3' cell without light, with rats as company, for ten months. He was tortured the entire time, beaten regularly by cables. Syrian authorities shared the results of his "interrogation" with the United States, and were given access to the results of his interrogation by American intelligence. He was released in October 2003, because the Syrians were unable to find any terrorist links. He was returned to Canada, where he has lived since with his family.

His capture and torture apparently was part of the Bush Administration's "rendition" program.

Arar's lawsuit against the United States is on appeal from its dismissal by a lower court, after the Administration invoked the "state secrets" privilege.

The Canadian government apologized for its part in the fiasco in January 2007, after a lengthy and thorough investigation, and paid Amar $10.5 million in compensation, plus his legal fees. Formal apologies were offered by both the RCMP and the Canadian government.

Former Attorney General Gonzales, on behalf of the Bush Administration, denied any evidence of torture, and asserted that Arar's rendition to Syria had been legal and fully within the Administration's rightful powers.

On October 18, 2007, Congressmen from both parties apologized to Mr. Arar and called on the Bush Administration to apologize on behalf of the nation. An Administration spokesman said there were no plans for an apology. Amar remains banned from entry into the United States.

Today, Secretary of State Rice did acknowledge that the matter had been "mishandled." Mistakes were made, apparently, although she did not use those words.

The Bush Administration still has not apologized.

------------------------
Information for this report was obtained from Wikipedia, and from two articles in MSNBC.

Friday, October 19, 2007

A Cruel Gift


I do not intend for this blog to degenerate into a collection of book and movie reviews. Occasionally, however, I run into books and movies that move me and that I feel are worth discussing. This week and last have been such occasions.

I remember the summer before I started college. It was a normal summer in many respects, but also felt surreal. As I looked ahead, my summer seemed destined, unlike earlier summers, to end abruptly in a massive wall of dense fog. On the other side of the wall, I knew, would be a move to California, palm trees, the university, dorm life, roommates, a future existence unlike anything I could imagine. Besides being opaque, moreover, the wall marked a frightening transition, a definitive line between being a kid and being an adult.

I was eager and excited. But I was also scared to death.

Someday This Pain Will Be Useful to You, by Peter Cameron, is the first-person account of James Sveck, a very smart, very literate, very funny, and very ironic 18-year-old boy from New York City. In September, James will head off to Brown University, an Ivy League school in Rhode Island. Or will he? James is not simply nervous about growing up, about going off by himself to a new life at a university. The prospect actually terrifies him, although he tells himself (and us) that he just can't bear to spend four years with the kind of kids his age who he imagines attend Brown. He is so terrified, in fact, that he has secretly resolved not to go, to move instead to some small town in the Midwest, and to spend four years, in solitide, educating himself by reading books. All the novels of Anthony Trollope, for example. Proust, perhaps. And poetry by obscure poets.

This book is being displayed in the Young Adult section of bookstores, for reasons that escape me. It is no more a book merely for teens than was Catcher in the Rye, to which it is being compared in reviews. James's sardonic sense of humor, his obsessive love for language together with his precocious ability to use and shape it, his fear of change and of adulthood, his desire for solitude, his reluctance to discuss his feelings with others, his distaste for other kids his own age -- if we strip away his veneer of New York sophistication, what's left reminds me of myself at 18, as it will many others of all ages who have successfully, if perhaps painfully, passed through that wall of fog and moved beyond.

The book contains two excruciating set pieces that reveal much about James. In one, suffering a probable panic attack, he flees a national high school leadership conference he was attending in Washington, D.C., and spends the remaining days of the trip by himself. He checks into a hotel with his mother's credit card, and hangs out in the National Gallery of Art (his mom is the proprietor of a small, rather absurd Chelsea art gallery back in Manhattan). While at the conference, he had repulsed every friendly overture by other students:

And then I realized she was really being nice. She was sincerely being nice. She was misguided, but she was being nice. But she didn't know what she was saying, she was saying come sit at our table as if that was something I could do. As if I could get up and sit down at her table and become a person sitting at her table. As if becoming a person sitting at her table only involved getting up and walking down a platform and sitting at her table.

"No, thank you," I said. "I'm fine alone."

In the other scene, he describes in great detail to his psychiatrist four paintings he had loved as an eighth grader, paintings that meant so much to him that he had bought prints of them with his own money, framed them and hung then in his room. The paintings represented the four stages of life. He had gradually come to realize, as he gazed at them, how much he wanted to skip the "adult" painting and move directly from adolescence to old age and death. (And then one day, a school friend visited his room and called the prints "stupid and faggy." Mortified, he took them down and threw them away.)

When his father, a large-firm lawyer, warns him that he couldn't avoid things just because they made him unhappy, he responds that his father doesn't understand. He's not just unhappy in the way his father imagines him to be unhappy. He is unhappy like he wants to die. His father "
didn't say anything else after that, he just patted my leg and went to the bar car and bought three of those little bottles of Johnnie Walker."

Now, James may well have a diagnosable personality disorder. But we sense as we read the book that personality disorders are merely exaggerations of the odd but "normal" traits and feelings that many of us share. Nevertheless, the devastating loneliness and fear of human contact that James's words and actions gradually reveal, emotions poorly concealed beneath his superficial sarcasm and disdain for others, will break your heart.

James is the kind of kid whose second grade teacher wrote that he tended to be "too clever for his own good." That's a judgment that his own rather detached, divorced parents, and his patronizing older sister, still appear to hold. (His peers, more bluntly, simply consider him a "misfit.") James recalls how, when he was a child, his mother would tell his sister: "Just ignore him. All he wants is attention." Wasn't it cruel, he wonders, to deny attention to a small child, when he so obviously and desperately needed it?

In harmony with the finest New York City traditions, James spends a considerable amount of the book matching wits -- in some very funny scenes, and in one scene that is quite moving -- with a rather bumbling psychiatrist his family has encouraged him to visit. He gains far greater insights from his beloved grandmother, a former actress who offers him non-judgmental attention along with hot meals. It is she who offers him the most encouraging -- and most perceptively true -- advice that he receives throughout the entire book:

People who have had only good experiences aren't very interesting. They may be content, and happy after a fashion, but they aren't very deep. It may seem a misfortune now, and it makes things difficult, but, well -- it's easy to feel all the happy, simple stuff. Not that happiness is necessarily simple. But I don't think you're going to have a life like that, and I think you'll be the better for it. The difficult thing is not to be overwhelmed by the bad patches. You mustn't let them defeat you. You must see them as a gift -- a cruel gift, but a gift nonetheless.

As my angst-ridden freshman dormmates would put the question in the course of midnight bull sessions, "Is it better to be happy and dumb, or brilliant and miserable?" James's grandmother assures him (and us) that risking misery beats doing nothing. We learn only from experience how we should spend our lives, and how we shouldn't. James had dismissed similar thoughts from his father. But he assures his more tactful grandmother the next morning, "You gave me a lot of good advice."

In the last chapter, he recalls a prefiguring childhood experience at his grandmother's house. His grandmother had casually suggested that he move from where he was sitting to a more comfortable location. Shortly after, a glass window pane unpredictably collapsed onto his original seat. They laughed at the time.

I don't know if the falling glass would have killed me -- probably not -- but I realized, in retrospect, that my grandmother had saved me, if not from death, then from terrible injury.

The book has no happy ending. Or even, really, an ending. Endings, happy or otherwise, are for Hollywood movies. Learning to live one's life is incremental, not the result of a blazing epiphany. James tells us he does go on to Brown in September. He does feel miserable his first semester. We suspect, we see hints, that his life later improves. But the book ends.

James's life, like all our lives, is a work in progress. We've been privileged to peer into it for a few months while James was 18.


Sunday, October 14, 2007

Post Script


A brief post script to the prior post.

Like any good movie, Into the Wild continues to reverberate in my mind, days after I've seen it. As I walked downtown today, I passed the usual scraggly, smelly panhandlers and beggars. A few are witty. Some are incoherent. A few actively solicit money. Most just stand on a corner, looking hopeless and exhausted. Others stroll around or meet together near alleyways. Most, obviously, have serious mental and/or drug and/or alcohol problems.

On the other hand, I note that they look no different from Chris McCandless, as he walked the streets of San Diego, trying to find a place to sleep. Who knows, one of these dirty, bearded men toting a bulky backpack may himself be a straight-A graduate from a prestigious college, just out "finding himself" for a year or two. The movie reminds us not to judge a book from its cover.

And what about the 99 percent who are not waiting for an admissions letter from Harvard Law? The ones who are druggies or mental cases, or just the victims of very bad luck? October 4 was the feast day of St. Francis of Assisi. You'd never know it from the statues of St. Francis that you find, along with the gnomes, in middle class gardens, but Francis rebelled against his wealthy, middle class father, and the world of luxury into which he had been born. He founded a religious order based on daily begging in the streets. He gave away everything he had, and embraced voluntary poverty. He loved animals and nature. His life reminds us of the Christian teaching that every man and woman -- whether rich or poor, clever or an idiot -- is of equal value before God, and, as our fellow human being, before us as well. This idealistic teaching, of course, is also the foundation stone of democracy, the principle behind the rule of "one-man, one-vote."

I still recoil with distaste from contact with filthy clothes, smelly bodies and unpredictable behavior. Chris and Francis remind me that this is my problem. Quit being so damn superficial. Get over it.

I'll try harder.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Into the Wild



At that stage of my youth, death remained as abstract a concept as non-Euclidean geometry or marriage. I didn't yet appreciate its terrible finality or the havoc it could wreak on those who'd entrusted the deceased with their hearts. I was stirred by the dark mystery of mortality. I couldn't resist stealing up to the edge of doom and peering over the brink. ... In my case -- and, I believe, in the case of Chris McCandless -- that was a very different thing from wanting to die.
--Jon Krakauer, Into the Wild

Before he was a writer, Krakauer was a mountain climber. Before writing Into the Wild, his previous books had all been about mountaineering. Like many men and women who climb mountains, he wonders why he does it. He also wonders whether the emotions and self-revelations won by confronting death, supported on a cliffside by fingertips and poorly anchored pitons, or on an ice wall by crampon tips and an ice axe, can ever justify the devastation that his actual death would visit upon his family and friends. Like all adventurers, all radicals, all visionaries, all prophets -- he wonders at the cost to be paid for deviating from the average, the cost not to himself but to those he loves.

In his book, Krakauer devotes a chapter to describing his own experience at the age of 23, attempting a solo first ascent of a peak in Alaska. During that climb, he stared at the face of death. He tells the story not as autobiography, but to explain why Chris McCandless walked into the wild. The only difference between the two, as Krakauer sees it, was that he was lucky and lived, and McCandless was unlucky and died.

Sean Penn's film of Into the Wild, of course, is now showing across the country. The movie is beautiful, exhilarating, funny, and heartbreaking. It faithfully adheres, for the most part, to the conclusions drawn in Krakauer's book about the life of Chris McCandless.

What the film cannot show, however, given the limitations of time and the film medium, is that McCandless's life as portrayed is really Krakauer's painstaking reconstruction of a life from fragmentary clues, from conversations with family members who knew him as a child and with persons who met him only briefly during his wanderings. To some extent, I suspect, the Chris McCandless that emerges is actually a picture of Jon Krakauer, modified to account for the known events of McCandless's life.

I think Krakauer may agree. I think, in fact, that Krakauer suggests as much in his book.

Nevertheless, few people could be as well positioned as a mountaineer to get under the skin of an oddball like Chris McCandless -- Alex Supertramp -- and to intuit the urges and motives that drove him to the post-college life he chose. McCandless was a seer, a prophet, a crazy man -- a person not willing to live an unthinking life amongst the herd, but driven to grasp and feel reality, sensation by sensation, minute by minute. It is the same drive shared by anyone who hikes, camps, climbs, or travels without reservations and guided tours. But he pushed his craziness to the brink of death, and over the brink; the rest of us push it only far enough, perhaps, to embrace discomfort as a road to experience. McCandless insisted on absolute purity in pursuing that dream; the rest of us keep a Visa card in our wallets, just in case.

The book and the movie arouse grief for the shortness of his life, a life that held so much promise, and for the gap his death left in so many other lives -- his parents, his sister, the elderly man who saw him as a grandson, the teenaged girl who dreamed of him as her lover. But it also reminds us how precious is every moment of life, and how wasteful we are of those moments. McCandless, for all his journal writing, for all his reading of Tolstoy and Thoreau and Jack London, sought to experience every blade of grass, every drop of rain, every ray of sunshine. He died at 24, but he experienced more life in those 24 years than many of us will in 90.

At the end of his life, he was ready to return to society, to live to some extent among the humanity that he had never rejected. Happiness must be shared, he notes.

See the movie, by all means. But read Krakauer's book as well.

He was alone. He was unheeded, happy, and near to the wild heart of life. He was alone and young and willful and wild-hearted, alone amidst a waste of wild air and brackish waters and the seaharvest of shells and tangle and veiled grey sunlight.
--James Joyce

Monday, October 8, 2007

The Cardinal is Waving, Over the Field


Stanford 24, U.S.C. 23

Amongst the many and varied topics I try to place before you, my readers, the role of sports is deservedly minimal. At best, the topic's sometimes worth an occasional ironic rolling of the eyes. In a world contorted by the suffering of the poor and hungry, a world led by the corrupt and the incompetent, a world facing an apocalyptic future of global warming, asteroidal collisions, and mutating strains of viruses run amok -- in such a world, it seems obscene to write seriously of kids throwing a ball around a grassy field when they should be in the library studying.

Cardinal 24, Trojans 23

Oh, I suppose that as a metaphor for human pluck and determination, an occasional sports story might provide a little comic relief, a little inspiration. Bad Luck Bears, Field of Dreams, all that sort of thing. But beyond a little unavoidable misting of the eyes and lump in the throat, akin to reading a child's dog story, such offerings do not fulfill the higher aspirations of you, my readers -- of you who seek after the Good, the True, and the Beautiful.

Stanford University 24, University of Southern California 23

But still (and again, I insist as metaphor), one occasionally runs into a story sufficiently unexpected and, well, inspiring, that I suppose we might find it worthwhile to mull it over briefly. Take, for example, a small West Coast school known for hard-working nerds blesssed with bigger SAT scores than biceps, whose eyes are fixed on high grades, doctoral programs, and the quixotic quest for the Nobel Prize. Imagine a grove of academe, so populated, trying to recruit students who fully meet its academic standards and, at the same time, are able to throw a pass, sack a quarterback, kick a field goal. Imagine these relatively skinny, idealistic, studious kids all dressed up in red and white running onto a football field week after week, and -- week and after week -- getting their metaphorical blocks knocked off.

Stanford 24, U.S.C. 23

Imagine another West Coast school, a large one, known academically to a few, perhaps, for an excellent film program, but known athletically to the entire sports universe as a factory of pure, vicious, college football power. The New York Yankees, the Green Bay Packers, the L.A. Lakers all distilled into a NCAA bastion of football excellence. A school whose football teams don't just aspire to championships, but consider themselves entitled to them. A school whose teams stumble across the American football landscape like a demented Tyrannosaurus Rex, head swaying from side to side, always seeking new fodder to devour.

Cardinal 24, Trojans 23

Imagine David and Goliath thus meeting face to face. Meeting not on neutral ground, mind you, but in the sacred and most holy mother ship of the beast itself. Imagine the University of Southern California hosting, with fevered howls of merriment from 90,000 boasting fans and a wave of a sword from their mounted and armored mascot, the red and white clad kids from Stanford University at the (all knees bend, all heads bow) Los Angeles Coliseum.

Stanford 24, U.S.C. 23


Imagine Stanford's record of 1-3, its only win being over San Jose State. Imagine Stanford's starting quarterback unable to play because of injury. Imagine a kid, a sophomore from Tacoma, Washington, who had never before started a game for the Cardinal, who had thrown only three passes in college play, stepping in as backup quarterback. Imagine Stanford as 41 point underdogs, when 42 1/2 points was the greatest spread anyone could recall having ever existed between two college teams. Imagine a Trojan team that had not lost a home game in five years.

Imagine what some are now calling the Greatest Upset in the History of College Football.

Stanford 24, U.S.C. 23



Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Bush vetoes child health care, saves cigarette smokers 61 cents per pack



"Do you think Oz will give me a heart?"

Monday, October 1, 2007

A grape time was had by all


Small towns began losing their swagger about a century ago.

Once easy travel and communications revealed their society and traditions to be not the center of the universe -- indeed, made it all too obvious that they appeared pathetic, laughable and parochial to so-called sophisticates in the large cities -- a crisis of confidence, over several decades, destroyed the unique character and enthusiasm of most small towns.

The "Lake Wobegons" of the nation either transformed themselves into bedroom satellites of large cities, or dwindled in importance economically while their aging residents watched their children leave, one by one, after high school graduation.

But please. Bear with me. I promise I'm depressing you for a reason. I'm happy to report that -- despite this conventional sociological description -- some small towns still flourish, and some are even reviving.

I've just returned from our family's annual gathering in Sonoma, where we helped celebrate the 110th annual Valley of the Moon Vintage Festival. As the name suggests, the festival marks the harvest of the year's grape crop, a critical event in the life of California's wine country. And the festival celebrates not only another year's bounty of the fruit of the vine, but also Sonoma's rich history dating back to Spanish times.

The city dates its origin from the founding of Mission San Francisco Solano -- the northernmost of the chain of Franciscan missions, starting with San Diego in the south -- in 1823. Even today, the center of town remains the original Spanish plaza, a large park surrounded by the restored Mission, the Spanish Presidio, and the house of General Vallejo -- not to mention a sizable number of cafés, bars, and souvenir, antique and gift shops. Sonoma also proudly claims to be the spot where the Bear Flag of the California Republic was first hoisted in revolt against Spanish rule.

But for me, more than the stomping of the grapes and the reveling in history, Sonoma is interesting as a small town that has kept its swagger. The wine tasting attracts not primarily wine snobs from San Francisco -- although they certainly do come -- but local citizens who know their wine and whose lives -- directly or indirectly -- depend on its excellence. This is a town where many local kids can describe the difference between a cabernet and a merlot, and are able to taste the difference, long before they can legally consume them.

The plaza is the site of what is, in effect, a lively town fair. Side by side with tasting booths run by local wineries, local organizations still unashamedly sell corn dogs and beer and cotton candy, local restaurants offer samples of local cooking, and the Boy Scouts give you the chance to win a locally produced salami by pelting one from a distance with a well-pitched potato.

Men and women entertain you by stomping grapes in their purple-stained bare feet.

The Sunday parade marches around the periphery of the plaza -- kids hidden beneath masses of purple or green balloons and thus disguised as bunches of grapes, local auto dealers circling in decorated new cars, the Wells Fargo stagecoach filled with kids and pulled by a fine team of horses, children dressed in Spanish colonial costume throwing cheap candy at other kids scrambling for goodies along the parade route, the Sonoma Valley High School marching band in full regalia (tiny ninth graders with tubas and bass horns marching alongside senior linebackers playing flutes) and followed by a farm tractor proudly blowing a diesel horn that drowns out the brave efforts of the band.

The entire multi-day festival is a wonderful chaos of events and crowds, and an anachronistic display of small-town self-confidence. Aside from the tourists, everyone knows each other and each other's kids. They shop at each other's shops, and eat and drink at each other's bars and eateries. In all the years I've attended, I've never seen any doubt expressed by a soul that -- for this weekend, at least -- there is no place on earth better deserving of everyone's presence. Not a hint that you could have a better time living it up in San Francisco, or watching a show on TV. For one weekend, Sonoma was the center of their universe.

Sonoma is a small town, but not a typical small town. But even so, it serves as a reminder of the high spirits, good nature, enthusiasm and pride that citizens of small towns across America once shared in abundance.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Denny Shines at Santa Cruz


Competitors leap into the surf to begin the 1.5 km swim. Santa Cruz. 2003

Readers may recall my hope, plaintively expressed earlier, that I might at least keep Denny in sight during our Laotian biking in November. My hopes seem now to be squelched with finality.

Denny competed in the Santa Cruz Sentinel Triathlon on September 23, finishing the three part event in a total time of 2 hours, 42 minutes, 1 second. He finished 369th in a total field of 839 participants. He was competing in a much stronger field this time. His finish time would have ranked him 16th in the Kings Trail Triathlon on Maui, where he competed last June. His strongest event was the run, where he ran a 10k in 48:46, after having already completed a 1.5 km swim in the cold Northern California Pacific Ocean, and a 40 km bike ride!

I've exhausted myself, just writing about it. I'm no longer worried about whether I can keep up with Denny in Laos. I now realize what a truly high class worry that was. My concern now is the effect on my morale as I watch Denny ride circles around me, a grin on his face and casually chatting, as I pant slowly up the 35-mile incline!

Congratulations, Den! Great job. We're all proud of you!

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Priorities


When George W. Bush took office, one of his first moves was to eliminate the huge Clinton budget surplus by handing out massive tax breaks to people in the highest tax brackets. (The 2001 recession contributed to the deficit, but the tax cuts were the prime factor.)

In 2003, he dragged the country into Iraq. He refused to raise taxes to pay for it. Your kids and your grandkids will still be footing the bill for the disastrous "War Against Weapons of Mass Destruction," long after you've gone on to your reward. The Iraq war is estimated to cost approximately $2 billion per week.

But President Bush has now promised to veto a bill expanding health insurance benefits for low income children. The bill would add $35 billion to the program over a five-year period. (In other words, the cost of 17 weeks of war in Iraq.) The expansion would be financed not by printing money, but by raising the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents per pack.

Good gracious. Where did the Great Decider's sudden concern for balancing the budget come from? Especially since the insurance would be financed by taxes on those persons who chose to worsen their own health and the health of people around them by smoking?

Bush has promised a veto, saying the measure is too costly, unacceptably raises taxes, extends government-covered insurance to children in families who can afford private coverage, and smacks of a move toward completely federalized health care.

Source: AP story, 9-22-07. Ah yes, "federalized health care." It all becomes clear. It's not the money, it's the principle of the thing.

Virtually all Democratic Congressman, and a substantial number of Republicans, support the expansion. Maybe Mr. Bush should get out and talk to doctors and hospital personnel -- and meet some of their young patients -- right there in Washington, D.C., just blocks from the cozy security of the Oval Office. Or even while back in God's country, Houston and Dallas.

Let him take a good look at the desperately ill children of low income families. Let the president look their parents in the eye, and explain to them his lofty theories about how they could have afforded private coverage if they'd really tried. And about how it's ok for the government to bail out banks when they make foolish home loans, but how when parents "fail" to find enough money to obtain health insurance, their kids simply have to live with the results of that "failure."

When forced to get out and meet voters where they shopped, while running for president, George Bush the Elder was amazed to discover that supermarkets had these new-fangled gadgets called check-out scanners. We were amazed that he was amazed. But who knows? Maybe son George W. might encounter some amazing epiphanies of his own -- if he ever emerged from his protective cocoon long enough to look around at the real world.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

State of Oregon ex rel. Godzilla v. Bambi


Jim discovered an injured fawn in his driveway, somewhere in rural Oregon. Legally he could have "hunted" the fawn, shot it, and mounted its head over his fireplace. The normal thing for any rural Oregonian to do. Instead, he nursed it back to health, named it "Snowball," and spent thousands of dollars on appropriate food and on modifying the interior of his house so the young deer could live inside. After a year, recovered, Snowball moved into a pen outside.

In the fullness of time, Snowball gave birth to her own child, named Bucky, fathered by a neighbor's tame buck.

Time passes. Suddenly, the State learned to its horror of the meretricious relationship between Jim and his two deer. State officials descended on Jim's property and seized the deer in the name of the sovereign State of Oregon. They charged Jim with raising deer without a permit. The deer probably would be put to death, they added as an afterthought.

In order to save Bambi and child, in other words, it had become necessary to destroy them. For their own good.

The State's action generated a modicum of adverse publicity. In fact, people were outraged. Caught unaware, officials stammered explanations about the dangers of raising deer. Diseases. Property-damaging rampages by marauding deer. Deer turning on their benefactors.

You don't know Bambi like we know Bambi, they explained. Bambi is a crazed beast of prey. This approach was not as successful with public opinion as had been hoped.

The State finds itself in a bind.

The State does issue permits to allow its citizens to rehabilitate wildlife. But it can't give one to Jim. Because it has already issued 16 of the precious pieces of paper, and 16 is the maximum its rules permit. God forbid it should issue 17. Rules is rules, I always say.

With one eye glancing back at their unprotected rear, and the other eye ahead to the next election, state officials now are considering the feasibility of declaring Snowball an "exceptional case," since she would be unable to survive on her own in the wild. As an exceptional case, Snowball would of course be exceptional. Therefore, not subject to the normal wildlife rules. And therefore Snowball not only could be returned to Jim, but law and equity would demand that she be so returned. Problem solved. Q.E.D.

But, alas, not Bucky. We have to draw the line somewhere. The State, when pressed hard enough, can show some compassion, some humanity, even some flexibility -- but the State of Oregon must not be made mock of. Bucky's fate is undecided, but he probably will be released into the wild to fend for himself.

But, hooray, Godzilla's foot does seem to have spared Bambi this time around.

The moral? Damned if I know. I guess if you see Godzilla's foot coming down on you, call your local newspaper posthaste.
----------------------
Author's Note: Bambi Meets Godzilla is a 1969 cartoon, rated as the 38th best cartoon of all time. The entire feature lasts only two minutes, most of which is devoted to the opening credits. The conclusion is left to the imagination of the reader, although the scene shown to the right may assist your imagination.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Chalk


Once upon a time, I thought I might become a high school teacher. It's hard to understand how I ever got this remarkable idea, especially when you consider that it occurred to me while I was a high school student myself. Nothing I knew about either my teachers (with a couple of exceptions) or my fellow students should have led me to believe that I would enjoy teaching. I guess I liked history and math, and naively believed that it would therefore be fun to teach those subjects to kids.

Seeing the movie Chalk would have swept away any such illusions. I could have seen myself as Mr. Lowrey, a shy first-year history teacher, standing nervous and tongue-tied before a restless, giggling class.

Lots of movies show high school from the kids' perspectives. Chalk gives us the teachers' side. It follows Mr. Lowrey and three other teachers through a school year at an urban Texas high school. The film, co-written by two former teachers, uses the "mockumentary" format, and does it so realistically that I could easily believe it was a true documentary. The lines and action are spontaneous and unforced. These are not professional actors playing cute high school kids, brimming over with witty one-liners. The girls are usually obese and unattractive; the boys are pimply, in need of shaves, and sullen. Most of all, the students look desperately in need of sleep.

For the teachers, the school year is a wasteland of long days, hostile or indifferent students, conflicts among themselves and with the administration. A broken copier or a "stolen" stapler is enough to push them over the edge.

Nevertheless, each of the four featured teachers makes personal progress during the year, and each develops some rapport with his or her students. We are given to understand that some learning by the kids does occur during the year, although we never see how it happens. This is not a Hollywood movie. None of the teachers even faintly resembles Robin Williams in Dead Poets Society.

I left the movie with enormous respect for the underpaid and overworked teaching profession. Although the movie gave some reason to question the quality of the education that the teachers themselves had received, it is clear that even the less sympathetic of the teachers cared deeply about the students and about their profession.

My short-lived desire to be a teacher was not without idealism, but it was an idealism on behalf of the academic subjects that I thought I wanted to teach. But for the vast majority of real high school teachers, their devotion is to the kids themselves -- somehow, anyhow, begging, enticing and forcing them to learn the very basic information they will need for life after graduation. As Mr. Lowrey remarks, as his year in hell comes to a close, "teaching is hard work." It is also extremely valuable work that deserves far better compensation, and far more respect than it receives from the rest of us.

One half of all new teachers quit the profession within their first three years. This movie shows us why. It was left up in the air whether Mr. Lowrey would sign the contract offered him for his second year.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

An unwelcome visitor


Did you ever sit alone, staring at an absolutely still pond? Most of us have. Most of us have also tossed a pebble into that pond, just to stir things up a bit. We watched the ripples spread out in all directions, on and on, with unforeseen effects on objects in their path. If the pond was wide enough, and the pebble large enough, disasters perhaps occurred to tiny objects, unsuspecting little "people," far from the original impact, long after the pebble was thrown.

Located between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter is the band of asteroids. About 160 million years ago, an asteroid about 110 miles in diameter was hit by a smaller asteroid, causing it to shatter. Some pieces flew off in all directions, but most remained in the same general area, creating the Baptistina family of asteroids

One piece that went astray is now believed to have created the "Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event," ramming into the earth in the Yucatan peninsula in Mexico about 65 million years ago -- nearly 100 million years after the original collision of asteroids. The fragments from the Yucatan impact have the same mineral composition as the Baptistina asteroids. That impact's effects on the planet are believed to have wiped out Earth's population of dinosaurs.

The gigantic Tycho crater near the Moon's south pole is believed to have been created by impact from another Baptistina fragment, 108 million years ago.

Even small asteroidal fragments can cause great damage when hitting a planet at full speed. An extraterrestial object, about 100 to 200 meters in diameter, exploded in the atmosphere over an unpopulated area of Siberia on June 30, 1908. The explosion had a power one thousand times that of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, and knocked down trees over 830 square miles.

Which now brings us to the asteroid Apophis, aptly named after an Egyptian god of destruction, discovered only in 2004. It's about 350 meters -- nearly four football fields -- in diameter. It weighs a lot, as you might guess. On April 13, 2029 -- 22 years from now -- it will pass so close to the Earth as to fly by below the orbits of the communication satellites circling our planet. At present, scientists do not think it will actually strike the Earth, but of course it's hard to be too certain about differences of a few miles in orbit, expected to occur 22 years from now. The results would be devastating if today's scientists are wrong.

Suggestions have been made that we send up a space probe, destined to encounter Apophis in 2014, that would keep an eye on it for about three years. This period of watching would give our best scientific brains about 15 years to figure out what to do, if a reasonable chance should then appear that "little" Apophis would drop in for a visit, via crash landing.

The best way to handle such a problem would be to somehow nudge the asteroid into a slightly different path, one that would cause it to sweep by a decade or so later at a more comfortable distance from your and my homes. Nudging an asteroid out of an existing orbit isn't all that easy, of course. It's never been tried before. It's sort of like using a fishing boat to nudge an oil tanker onto a different course in mid-ocean. But rest assured that the good people at NASA are mulling over the situation, even as we speak.

But aside from the scientific and engineering questions raised by such a threat, think of the psychological implications should we learn in 2014 that Apophis had plans for a terrestial visit in 2029. Democrats couldn't blame the problem on the Republicans. Americans couldn't blame it on the Arabs. The Senate couldn't hold endless hearings on the issue, hoping that it would just go away or people would lose interest in it. We couldn't just turn off our TV sets and think about our golf games. It wouldn't be a communist plot. We couldn't exercise our normal foreign policy solution of bombing the asteroid back to the dark ages -- any attempt to blow it up would cause it to shatter, and Earth would be subjected to a devastating solid rock hailstorm.

Nope, somehow the human race would have to sit down together and work out a plan that would save all of us -- not just our friends and ideological allies -- not just the rich -- not just the Christians -- not just the white race -- from a virtually certain collision that might well send us all off to the same happy hunting ground in which the dinosaurs found themselves 65 million years ago.

Who knows? The experience might cause a spiritual revolution. After experiencing success working together to save ourselves and all our diversity of cultures from common annihilation, we just might all be able to sit down and work together to solve other, lesser problems in the future.

But don't bet the family store on it.